IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v39y2025i4p814-835.html

How Care Inequalities are Reproduced in ‘Carer-Friendly’ Jobs: The Case of Employer-Led Carer’s Leave

Author

Listed:
  • Camille Allard

    (Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy)

Abstract

This article investigates how working carers – workers with care responsibilities for a long-term ill, ageing or disabled relative – negotiate their care responsibilities when employed in a ‘carer-friendly’ job with access to paid carer’s leave. Based on narrative interviews with 17 working carers in the UK, the article explores how the availability of carer’s leave influences carers’ perception and legitimisation of their roles as ‘carers’ within their families. By drawing on, and extending Acker’s concept of ‘inequality regimes’, the article uncovers the organisational processes, discourses of legitimisation and normative pressures that shape carers’ roles both in their workplaces and at home. It argues that having a job supported by a ‘carer-friendly’ employer – but without a right to statutory paid carer’s leave – can reinforce the normative perceptions of ‘who’ should be a carer at home.

Suggested Citation

  • Camille Allard, 2025. "How Care Inequalities are Reproduced in ‘Carer-Friendly’ Jobs: The Case of Employer-Led Carer’s Leave," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(4), pages 814-835, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:814-835
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170251337682
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170251337682
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170251337682?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geraldine Healy & Ahu Tatli & Gulce Ipek & Mustafa Özturk & Cathrine Seierstad & Tessa Wright, 2019. "In the steps of Joan Acker: A journey in researching inequality regimes and intersectional inequalities," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(12), pages 1749-1762, December.
    2. Emma Hagqvist & Stig Vinberg & Jonathan Q Tritter & Erika Wall & Bodil J Landstad, 2020. "The Same, Only Different: Doing Management in the Intersection between Work and Private Life for Men and Women in Small-scale Enterprises," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(2), pages 262-280, April.
    3. Eleonora Matteazzi & Stefani Scherer, 2021. "Gender Wage Gap and the Involvement of Partners in Household Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(3), pages 490-508, June.
    4. Edmund Heery & Brian Abbott & Stephen Williams, 2012. "The Involvement of Civil Society Organizations in British Industrial Relations: Extent, Origins and Significance," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 47-72, March.
    5. Tracy Wilcox & Michelle Greenwood & Alison Pullen & Anne O’Leary Kelly & Deborah Jones, 2021. "Interfaces of domestic violence and organization: Gendered violence and inequality," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 701-721, March.
    6. Nancy Folbre, 2012. "Should Women Care Less? Intrinsic Motivation and Gender Inequality," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 50(4), pages 597-619, December.
    7. Jennifer Hook, 2015. "Incorporating ‘Class’ into Work-Family Arrangements: Insights from and for Three Worlds," LIS Working papers 639, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    8. Sibylle Gollac & Céline Bessière, 2020. "Le genre du capital. Comment la famille reproduit les inégalités," Post-Print hal-03089567, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathalie Clavijo, 2023. "Mi casa de los Espíritus (My house of spirits): Challenging patriarchy with magical feminism," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 1795-1815, September.
    2. María Gabriela Palacio, 2016. "Institutionalizing segregation: Conditional cash transfers and employment choices," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2016-91, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Edmund Heery, 2018. "Fusion or replacement? Labour and the ‘new’ social movements," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 661-680, November.
    4. Clémentine Cottineau & Julie Vallée, 2022. "Introduction," Post-Print hal-03806227, HAL.
    5. Layla Branicki & Senia Kalfa & Alison Pullen & Stephen Brammer, 2023. "Corporate Responses to Intimate Partner Violence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 657-677, November.
    6. Céline Bessiere & Sibylle Gollac, 2021. "Capital," Post-Print halshs-03513446, HAL.
    7. Edwina Pio & Vikashni Moore, 2022. "Battered South‐Asian diasporic women: Culture, secrets and work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 536-560, March.
    8. Leila Gautham & Nancy Folbre & Kristin Smith, 2024. "Earnings inequality and the expansion of care services in the United States, 1985–2019," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 119-140, March.
    9. Charles Barthold & Victor Krawczyk & Marco Berti & Vincenza Priola, 2022. "Intersectionality on screen. A coloniality perspective to understand popular culture representations of intersecting oppressions at work," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 1890-1909, November.
    10. Brian Abbott & Steve Williams, 2014. "Widening the ‘representation gap'? The implications of the ‘lobbying act’ for worker representation in the UK," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(6), pages 507-523, November.
    11. Tista Mukherjee & Ishita Mukhopadhyay, 2022. "Albeit Satisfied: Unveiling Female Paid Domestic Workers in India," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 16(2), pages 248-266, August.
    12. Quinonez, Pablo & Maldonado-Erazo, Claudia, 2020. "An overview of gender inequality in Latin America from a political economy perspective," MPRA Paper 102892, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Wei Zhang & Zhun Xu, 2022. "Gender Norms and Household Labor: Time Use in the Context of Social Class Differentiation in Transitional China," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 54(1), pages 106-121, March.
    14. Núria Sánchez‐Mira, 2020. "Work–family arrangements and the crisis in Spain: Balkanized gender contracts?," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(6), pages 944-970, November.
    15. Roos, Louisa, 2025. "The true gender pay gap: Accounting for the distribution of unpaid labour," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    16. Christine A. Riordan & Alexander M. Kowalski, 2021. "From Bread and Roses to #MeToo: Multiplicity, Distance, and the Changing Dynamics of Conflict in IR Theory," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 74(3), pages 580-606, May.
    17. Gabriella Alberti, 2016. "Moving beyond the dichotomy of workplace and community unionism: The challenges of organising migrant workers in London’s hotels," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 37(1), pages 73-94, February.
    18. Elisa Brini & Mariya Lenko & Stefani Scherer & Agnese Vitali, 2021. "Retraditionalisation? Work patterns of families with children during the pandemic in Italy," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 45(31), pages 957-972.
    19. repec:osf:socarx:vstm4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Joyce Jiang & Marek Korczynski, 2024. "The Role of Community Organisations in the Collective Mobilisation of Migrant Workers: The Importance of a ‘Community’-Oriented Perspective," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(2), pages 339-357, April.
    21. Isabel Távora & Paula Rodríguez‐Modroño, 2018. "The impact of the crisis and austerity on low educated working women: The cases of Spain and Portugal," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(6), pages 621-636, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:4:p:814-835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.