IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v39y2025i3p636-656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘I am a Scaffolder’: Constructing Safety Knowledge and Machismo in ‘Dirty Work’

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Kamoche

    (Nottingham University Business School, UK)

  • Kuok Kei Law

    (NUCB Business School, Japan)

Abstract

This article investigates how Hong Kong scaffolders navigate and make sense of everyday dangerous work which is stigmatized in a highly aspirational society. With the theoretical lens of ‘dirty work’, we examine what attracts the scaffolders into the occupation, how they perceive and navigate risk, and how they construct the knowledge that enables them to function safely as skilled craftsmen. We found that the sector attracts young men from disadvantaged backgrounds and with links to the criminal underworld, who respond to social stigma by constructing an identity of intrepid performers and enacting unsafe high-risk activities and brinkmanship. Yet, their traditional knowledge and practices now face obsolescence due to pressure to standardize safety training and practice, and also due to an internal crisis of occupational legitimacy. This article contributes to our understanding of the analytical lens of ‘dirty work’ in macho cultures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Kamoche & Kuok Kei Law, 2025. "‘I am a Scaffolder’: Constructing Safety Knowledge and Machismo in ‘Dirty Work’," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(3), pages 636-656, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:3:p:636-656
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170241281032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170241281032
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170241281032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:3:p:636-656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.