IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v39y2025i3p527-550.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Gains From Organizational Flexibility? Flexible Organizational Practices and Wage Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Alina Rozenfeld-Kiner

    (University of Haifa, Israel)

  • Tali Kristal

    (University of Haifa, Israel)

Abstract

This study explores the implications of flexible management practices for organizational wage gaps. It argues that the implementation of high-performance and non-standard employment practices is not only skill but also class-biased, favouring workers in supervisory positions. This argument is examined using matched employer–employee data from the 2011 British Workplace Employment Relations Study (WERS) survey, which uniquely includes detailed information on flexible management practices. Findings from fixed-effects models support the argument. Wage gaps are more pronounced between supervisors and rank-and-file workers in organizations implementing high-performance or non-standard employment practices, compared to those without such practices. Notably, heightened education-based wage gaps are observed in organizations adopting only non-standard practices. The results suggest that purportedly efficiency-oriented changes in organizational practices are not wage-neutral but tend to favour already well-compensated workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Alina Rozenfeld-Kiner & Tali Kristal, 2025. "Who Gains From Organizational Flexibility? Flexible Organizational Practices and Wage Inequality," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(3), pages 527-550, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:3:p:527-550
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170251317979
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170251317979
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170251317979?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:39:y:2025:i:3:p:527-550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.