IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v37y2023i5p1339-1358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Union Equality Structures and the Challenge of Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of the Fire Brigades Union

Author

Listed:
  • Tessa Wright

    (Queen Mary University of London, UK)

  • Sian Moore

    (University of Greenwich, UK)

  • Phil Taylor

    (University of Strathclyde, UK)

Abstract

This article examines two commonly adopted trade union strategies to increase the representation of under-represented groups – first, reserved seats on union decision-making bodies and second, self-organisation, involving separate structures. It does so through the case of the Fire Brigades Union (FBU), whose equality reforms were considered remarkable within the union movement and fire service due to the union’s small size and highly male-dominated, white membership. However, reserved seats at senior levels were later removed following objection on the grounds of democratic legitimacy. The article examines this decision using original data comparing UK union rules for additional representation. It exposes the tensions for small, male-dominated unions of reconciling Young’s theoretical principles of ‘group-differentiated democracy’ with the realities of perceived democratic legitimacy, and argues that progress on union equality is contingent on both the particular forms of democratic representation and the political and industrial context.

Suggested Citation

  • Tessa Wright & Sian Moore & Phil Taylor, 2023. "Union Equality Structures and the Challenge of Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of the Fire Brigades Union," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(5), pages 1339-1358, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:5:p:1339-1358
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170211072796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170211072796
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170211072796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:5:p:1339-1358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.