IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v37y2023i5p1279-1298.html

Work in the Gig-Economy: The Role of the State and Non-State Actors Ceding and Seizing Regulatory Space

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Inversi

    (University of Manchester, UK)

  • Tony Dundon

    (University of Limerick, Ireland)

  • Lucy-Ann Buckley

    (National University of Ireland Galway, Ireland)

Abstract

Using the concept of regulatory space, this article asks how both the state and non-state actors influence employment regulations particular to the gig-economy. To address this question a mixed method approach is used, including interviews with strategically placed informants involved in policy formation at national and international levels, content analysis of legal cases, parliamentary inquiry transcripts and policy reports. The analysis contributes to an understanding of employment regulation by the state in two ways. First, it reports distinct ‘levers’, which lead to a particular state role of ‘ceding and seizing’ regulatory power. Second, it argues that these levers ultimately serve the accumulation interests of capital over the legitimacy of employment rights for labour. The findings have wider societal implications for issues of equity, justice and employment regulation applicable to the gig-economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Inversi & Tony Dundon & Lucy-Ann Buckley, 2023. "Work in the Gig-Economy: The Role of the State and Non-State Actors Ceding and Seizing Regulatory Space," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(5), pages 1279-1298, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:5:p:1279-1298
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170221080387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170221080387
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170221080387?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleanor Kirk, 2018. "The (re)organisation of conflict at work: Mobilisation, counter-mobilisation and the displacement of grievance expressions," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(4), pages 639-660, November.
    2. Tony Dundon & Tony Dobbins & Niall Cullinane & Eugene Hickland & Jimmy Donaghey, 2014. "Employer occupation of regulatory space of the Employee Information and Consultation (I&C) Directive in liberal market economies," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 28(1), pages 21-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daina Bellido de Luna, 2026. "Regulatory influence on the overall quality of platform work: Lessons from the Chilean context," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 47(1), pages 196-217, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian Clark & James Hunter & Richard Pickford & Huw Fearnall-Williams, 2022. "How do licensing regimes limit worker interests? Evidence from informal employment in Britain," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 431-449, February.
    2. Alan Felstead & Duncan Gallie & Francis Green & Golo Henseke, 2019. "The determinants of skills use and work pressure: A longitudinal analysis," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 40(3), pages 730-754, August.
    3. Peter Butler & Jonathan Lavelle & Patrick Gunnigle & Michelle O’Sullivan, 2018. "Skating on thin ICE? A critical evaluation of a decade of research on the British Information and Consultation Regulations (2004)," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 39(1), pages 173-190, February.
    4. Daina Bellido de Luna, 2022. "Management, the state and union-weakening practices in Chile: A case study approach of the dual and ambivalent role of the state in a process of democratisation," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(3), pages 1143-1163, August.
    5. Halpin Lisa & Dundon Tony, 2017. "Whistle-blowing and the employment relations implications of the ‘Protected Disclosures Act 2014’ in the Republic of Ireland," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 36(3), pages 221-232.
    6. Vincenzo Maccarrone, 2024. "The Europeanization of Wage Policy and Its Consequences for Labor Politics: The Case of Ireland," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(5), pages 716-741, October.
    7. Linda Clarke & Ian Fitzgerald, 2020. "The changing nature of labour regulation: the distinctiveness of the National Agreement for the Engineering Construction Industry," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(1-2), pages 58-74, March.
    8. Anthony Dobbins & Tony Dundon, 2015. "Irish workplace partnership: unbridgeable tensions between an 'Irish third way' of voluntary mutuality and neo-liberal forces," Working Papers 15011, Bangor Business School, Prifysgol Bangor University (Cymru / Wales).
    9. Nadia K. Kougiannou & Adrian Wilkinson & Tony Dundon, 2022. "Inside the meetings: The role of managerial attitudes in approaches to information and consultation for employees," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 60(3), pages 585-605, September.
    10. Katarzyna Skorupińska-Cieślak, 2021. "What determines the role and position of works councils? Models of councils in Polish organizations," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(4), pages 1123-1148, November.
    11. Jimmy Donaghey & Niall Cullinane & Tony Dundon & Tony Dobbins & Eugene Hickland, 2022. "Employee choice of voice and non‐union worker representation," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(6), pages 503-522, November.
    12. Karen Jaehrling & Mathew Johnson & Trine P Larsen & Bjarke Refslund & Damian Grimshaw, 2018. "Tackling Precarious Work in Public Supply Chains: A Comparison of Local Government Procurement Policies in Denmark, Germany and the UK," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(3), pages 546-563, June.
    13. Tony Dundon & Tony Dobbins, 2015. "Militant partnership: a radical pluralist analysis of workforce dialectics," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(6), pages 912-931, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:5:p:1279-1298. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.