IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v37y2023i5p1226-1243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Union Coalitions and Strategic Framing: The Case of the Agricultural Advisory Panel for Wales

Author

Listed:
  • Leon Gooberman

    (Cardiff University, UK)

  • Marco Hauptmeier

    (Cardiff University, UK)

Abstract

This article analyses the creation of a union coalition that introduced a new employment relations institution: the Agricultural Advisory Panel for Wales. Building on social movement theory, the article argues that the union’s strategic framing within a conducive political opportunity structure enabled the coalition to form and pursue its goals. The union engaged in a specific frame alignment strategy, frame bridging, to explore and mobilize intersections and shared interests between its own frame and those of its coalition partners. Frame bridging prompted actors to reverse their policy preferences and participate in the coalition, which was facilitated by a political opportunity structure formed from the political salience of the agricultural sector and pre-existing social ties in the ‘small state’ political economy of Wales. The article contributes to the literature by developing and extending the frame bridging concept as a process enabling union coalitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Leon Gooberman & Marco Hauptmeier, 2023. "Union Coalitions and Strategic Framing: The Case of the Agricultural Advisory Panel for Wales," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(5), pages 1226-1243, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:5:p:1226-1243
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170211069787
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170211069787
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170211069787?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:5:p:1226-1243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.