IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v37y2023i4p934-951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fragmented Capital and (the Loss of) Control over Posted Workers: A Case Study in the Belgian Meat Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Anne Theunissen

    (Hasselt University, Belgium)

  • Patrizia Zanoni

    (Hasselt University, Belgium; Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

  • Koen Van Laer

    (Hasselt University, Belgium)

Abstract

Based on the case of a Belgian meat processing company that relies on posted workers employed by two subcontractors, this study investigates how posting affects client capital’s ability to control labour. Analysed through a Labour Process Theory lens, the findings reveal that posting fragments capital and substantially reduces the client firm’s control over workers’ effort and mobility power. This is due to the low-cost, temporary nature of posting, the disembeddedness of posted workers and their stronger relations with their employer than with the client firm. Competing to control posted labour, both units of capital enact practices commonly associated with trade unions: client capital advocates for posted workers in its interactions with the subcontractor, and the subcontractor promotes posted workers’ reduction of effort and increased mobility against the interests of client capital. Because of their structural vulnerability, posted workers might leverage conflicts within capital to resist the harshest forms of exploitation.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne Theunissen & Patrizia Zanoni & Koen Van Laer, 2023. "Fragmented Capital and (the Loss of) Control over Posted Workers: A Case Study in the Belgian Meat Industry," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(4), pages 934-951, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:4:p:934-951
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170211059733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170211059733
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170211059733?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:4:p:934-951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.