IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v36y2022i6p999-1017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘Gender Face’ of Job Insecurity in France: An Individual- and Organizational-Level Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Clotilde Coron

    (IAE Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, France)

  • Géraldine Schmidt

    (IAE Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, France)

Abstract

Admittedly, women have a more precarious situation on the job market than men, which would suggest that they feel more insecure. However, literature on subjective job insecurity (JI) is contradictory about the effect of gender on JI. This could be explained by both individual characteristics and labour market gendered segregation – the companies in which women and men work do not have the same characteristics, particularly in terms of strategy and workforce management. Previous literature on JI rarely addresses this phenomenon. We propose to better understand the ‘gender face’ of subjective JI combining individual and organizational characteristics. We utilize data from the 2017 REPONSE survey and generalized linear models, notably multi-level models. Our findings reveal that, although women hold more precarious jobs, they work in more protective organizations. Consequently, while women report an average lower level of JI, this difference disappears when controlling for individual and organizational variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Clotilde Coron & Géraldine Schmidt, 2022. "The ‘Gender Face’ of Job Insecurity in France: An Individual- and Organizational-Level Analysis," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(6), pages 999-1017, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:6:p:999-1017
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017021995673
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017021995673
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017021995673?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:6:p:999-1017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.