IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v36y2022i4p665-682.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional Labour and the Autonomy of Dependent Self-Employed Workers: The Limitations of Digital Managerial Control in the Home Credit Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Esme Terry

    (University of Leeds, UK; Heriot-Watt University, UK)

  • Abigail Marks

    (Newcastle University, UK)

  • Arek Dakessian

    (Queen Margaret University, UK)

  • Dimitris Christopoulos

    (Heriot-Watt University, UK; Modul University Vienna, Austria)

Abstract

Changes to the labour process in the home credit sector have exposed the industry’s agency workforce to increased levels of digital managerial control through the introduction of lending applications and algorithmic decision-making techniques. This article highlights the heterogeneous nature of the impact of digitalisation on the labour process and worker autonomy – specifically, in terms of workers’ engagement in unquantified emotional labour. By considering the limitations of digital control in relation to qualitative elements of the labour process, it becomes evident that emotional labour has the scope to be a source of autonomy for dependent self-employed workers when set against a backdrop of heightened digital control. This article therefore contributes to ongoing labour process debates surrounding digitalisation, quantified workers and digital managerial control.

Suggested Citation

  • Esme Terry & Abigail Marks & Arek Dakessian & Dimitris Christopoulos, 2022. "Emotional Labour and the Autonomy of Dependent Self-Employed Workers: The Limitations of Digital Managerial Control in the Home Credit Sector," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(4), pages 665-682, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:4:p:665-682
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017020979504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017020979504
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017020979504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:4:p:665-682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.