IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v36y2022i4p648-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Residential Care Aides’ Experiences of Workplace Incivility in Long-Term Care

Author

Listed:
  • Heather A Cooke

    (University of British Columbia, Canada)

  • Jennifer Baumbusch

    (University of British Columbia, Canada)

Abstract

Exposure to peer incivility and bullying potentially disrupts the respectful, collaborative workplace relationships essential to quality care provision in long-term care homes. This study critically examined the nature of peer incivility and bullying in residential care aides’ workplace relationships. Using critical ethnography, 100 hours of participant observation and 33 semi-structured interviews were conducted with residential care aides, licensed practical nurses, support staff and management in two, non-profit care homes in British Columbia, Canada. While residential care aides’ experiences of bullying were rare, peer incivility was pervasive, occurring on an almost daily basis. Two key themes, ‘gendered work environment’ and ‘seeking informal power and control’, reflect how residential care aides experienced and explained their uncivil encounters. Findings highlight the gendered, relationally aggressive nature of workplace mistreatment within this predominantly female workforce.

Suggested Citation

  • Heather A Cooke & Jennifer Baumbusch, 2022. "Residential Care Aides’ Experiences of Workplace Incivility in Long-Term Care," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(4), pages 648-664, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:4:p:648-664
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017020977314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017020977314
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017020977314?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:4:p:648-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.