IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v35y2021i6p1155-1166.html

Thursday Night and a Sing-along ‘Sung Alone’: The Experiences of a Self-employed Performer During the Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Hancock

    (University of Essex, UK)

  • Melissa Tyler

    (University of Essex, UK)

  • Mark Godiva

    (Musician, UK)

Abstract

COVID-19 has had a devastating impact on those working in the UK’s creative economy, and particularly its entertainment sector. This article explores the experiences of Mark Godiva, a self-employed musician whose livelihood has been radically threatened by the virus and its associated restrictions. Mark’s story highlights both the continuities and challenges that have been created for those working on the front line of what is a dramatically altered cultural landscape. It illustrates the continuing precarity of his work, and how the need for additional entrepreneurial skills, beyond simply being a performer, have become more important than ever. At the same time, it considers some of the technical, affective, spatial, and even existential challenges associated with working over a range of social media platforms that performers such as Mark have experienced.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Hancock & Melissa Tyler & Mark Godiva, 2021. "Thursday Night and a Sing-along ‘Sung Alone’: The Experiences of a Self-employed Performer During the Pandemic," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(6), pages 1155-1166, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:35:y:2021:i:6:p:1155-1166
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170211045830
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170211045830
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170211045830?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Will Sutherland & Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi & Michael Dunn & Sarah Beth Nelson, 2020. "Work Precarity and Gig Literacies in Online Freelancing," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 457-475, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Behl, Abhishek & Jayawardena, Nirma & Ishizaka, Alessio & Gupta, Manish & Shankar, Amit, 2022. "Gamification and gigification: A multidimensional theoretical approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1378-1393.
    2. Ana Alacovska & Eliane Bucher & Christian Fieseler, 2024. "A Relational Work Perspective on the Gig Economy: Doing Creative Work on Digital Labour Platforms," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 161-179, February.
    3. Maria Akhtar & Azmat Yar Khan & Aneeqa Zubair, 2026. "Metaverse Insights: Boosting Freelancers’ Performance via Work Flexibility and Career Adaptability in the Lens of Social Cognitive Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 17(1), pages 2531-2554, February.
    4. Nancy Worth & E. Alkim Karaagac, 2022. "Accounting for Absences and Ambiguities in the Freelancing Labour Relation," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 113(1), pages 96-108, February.
    5. Holly Patrick-Thomson & Michael Kranert, 2021. "Don’t Work for Free: Online Discursive Resistance to Precarity in Commercial Photography," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(6), pages 1034-1052, December.
    6. Jie Ren & Viju Raghupathi & Wullianallur Raghupathi, 2023. "Exploring Influential Factors in Hiring Freelancers in Online Labor Platforms: An Empirical Study," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Lena Knappert & Boukje Cnossen & Renate Ortlieb, 2025. "Inequality Regimes in Coworking Spaces: How New Forms of Organising (Re)produce Inequalities," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(1), pages 43-63, February.
    8. Qi Zheng & Jing Zhan & Xinying Xu, 2024. "Platform Training and Learning by Doing and Gig Workers’ Incomes: Empirical Evidence From China’s Food Delivery Riders," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    9. Netta Avnon, 2021. "Data Scientists’ Identity Work: Omnivorous Symbolic Boundaries in Skills Acquisition," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(2), pages 332-349, April.
    10. Yaoyao Wei & Cuiyin yao & Wei-fan Chen & Tian Xie & Jinzhao Yang, 2024. "Qbnb: An innovative C2B2C2B2C e-commerce mode for integrated on-demand services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(3), pages 1-29, March.
    11. Valeria Pulignano & Karol Muszyński & Maite Tapia, 2024. "Variations of Freelancers’ “Effort-Bargain†Experiences in Platform Work: The Role of Skills," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 77(5), pages 742-769, October.
    12. Jing Wang & Quan Meng, 2024. "Unregulated Flexibility and the Multiplication of Labour: Work in the Chinese Platform Economy," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.
    13. Maria Hameed Khan & Jannine Williams & Penny Williams & Robyn Mayes, 2024. "Caring in the Gig Economy: A Relational Perspective of Decent Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(4), pages 1107-1127, August.
    14. Dominika Polkowska, 2021. "Unionisation and mobilisation within platform work: towards precarisation—a case of Uber drivers in Poland," Industrial Relations Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 25-39, January.
    15. Christina Purcell & Paul Brook, 2022. "At Least I’m My Own Boss! Explaining Consent, Coercion and Resistance in Platform Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(3), pages 391-406, June.
    16. Ward van Zoonen & Anu E Sivunen, 2026. "Autonomy’s Mirage: How Fauxtonomy Fuels Workers’ Frustration in the Gig Economy," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 40(2), pages 314-336, April.
    17. Vanessa Beck & Tracey Warren & Clare Lyonette, 2025. "Is Any Job Better Than No Job? Utilising Jahoda’s Latent Deprivation Theory to Reconceptualise Underemployment," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 39(2), pages 404-425, April.
    18. Meredith Dedema & Howard Rosenbaum, 2024. "Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: A systematic literature review: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 344-374, March.
    19. Thomas, Robert D. & Davis, John W. & Cuccaro, Paula M. & Gemeinhardt, Gretchen L., 2022. "Assessing associations between insecure income and US workers’ health: An IPUMS-MEPS analysis," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    20. Yao Yao & Sida Liu, 2025. "Where rookies prevail: Digital habitus and age‐based earnings differentials in online legal services," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 63(1), pages 30-51, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:35:y:2021:i:6:p:1155-1166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.