IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v32y2018i1p186-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Health and Well-Being at Work Agenda: Good News for (Disabled) Workers or Just a Capital Idea?

Author

Listed:
  • Deborah Foster

Abstract

Health and well-being (H&WB) initiatives have increasingly appeared in workplaces, but are the subject of surprisingly little critical analysis. The terms H&WB have also become positively embedded in Human Resource Management (HRM) and academic vocabularies, often displacing disability, which, it is argued, is (wrongly) regarded as a negative descriptor. This article challenges the sometimes taken-for-granted assumption that employer-led H&WB initiatives are inherently positive. It considers how they are being used to undermine statutory trade union health and safety representatives, reinforce concepts of normalcy and ableism in respect of worker lifestyle and impairments, and individualize/medicalize experiences of workplace stress. Utilizing a critical disability studies lens debate challenges a dominant element of many H&WB programmes – employee resilience – and concludes that a social model of disability and workplace well-being is needed to focus debate on the social, economic and political causes of ill-health and dis-ability in workplaces under neo-liberal austerity.

Suggested Citation

  • Deborah Foster, 2018. "The Health and Well-Being at Work Agenda: Good News for (Disabled) Workers or Just a Capital Idea?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(1), pages 186-197, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:186-197
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017016682458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017016682458
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017016682458?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Russell, Helen & Maître, Bertrand & Watson, Dorothy & Fahey, Éamonn, 2018. "Job Stress and working conditions: Ireland in comparative perspective — An analysis of the European Working Conditions Survey," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number RS84, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:32:y:2018:i:1:p:186-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.