IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v29y2015i5p792-807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ideal worker as real abstraction: labour conflict and subjectivity in nursing

Author

Listed:
  • Magnus Granberg

Abstract

The article interrogates the significance of the ideal nurse as an ideal worker in a context of labour conflict, using interview material from a study of an episode of conflict ending in the collective resignation of a group of nurses from a Swedish hospital ward. It puts forward the thesis that this ideal worker is best understood as an abstraction that ‘achieves practical truth’, that is, as a hypostasized practice or a ‘real abstraction’. Hence, this management ideology exceeds strictly discursive dimensions. The analysis points to an enactment at the level of work practice prior to any explicit articulation of this ideology. Analysis attends to positioning on collective action, the identity work this positioning entailed and the ‘truth’ of nursing summoned therein, pointing to the ubiquity of the ideal worker in nursing along with its practical enactment.

Suggested Citation

  • Magnus Granberg, 2015. "The ideal worker as real abstraction: labour conflict and subjectivity in nursing," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 29(5), pages 792-807, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:29:y:2015:i:5:p:792-807
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017014563102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017014563102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017014563102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:29:y:2015:i:5:p:792-807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.