IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v27y2013i6p932-951.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trade-based skills versus occupational capacity: the example of bricklaying in Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Linda Clarke

    (University of Westminster, UK)

  • Christopher Winch

    (King’s College London, UK)

  • Michaela Brockmann

    (University of Southampton, UK)

Abstract

This article shows why qualifications built on occupational capacity rather than on trade-based skills have more potential to accommodate the aims of the European Qualifications Framework (EQF) and changes in the labour process, going together with the development of occupational labour markets. The article challenges the distinct Anglo-Saxon notion of ‘skill’ attached to a trade-based system of vocational education and training (VET), where qualifications have weak labour market currency. This distinctiveness has implications for EQF implementation, built on common understanding of knowledge, skills and competences and intended to establish equivalence between different occupational qualifications. The article focuses on the example of bricklaying in England and Germany, an occupation archetypal of construction and skilled manual work. Clear differences are identified between bricklaying founded on developing occupational capacity through negotiation and regulation by stakeholders, recognized through qualifications, and bricklaying as a demarcated trade, defined by output and with ‘skills’ distinct from other trades.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda Clarke & Christopher Winch & Michaela Brockmann, 2013. "Trade-based skills versus occupational capacity: the example of bricklaying in Europe," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 27(6), pages 932-951, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:27:y:2013:i:6:p:932-951
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/27/6/932.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:27:y:2013:i:6:p:932-951. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.