IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v10y1996i2p297-318.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjectivity and the Labour Process: A Case Study in the Restaurant Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Mike Sosteric

    (Department of Sociology at the University of Alberta, Canada)

Abstract

This study focuses on the work experiences of employees, and on the changing relationships between employees and managers, in a mid-sized popular dance nightclub in a small western Canadian city. This nightclub had, in many ways, a unique organisational environment. Normative expectations about the quality of work in the food and beverage industry (de-skilled, highly standardised) did not initially hold. Employees developed an articulate and sophisticated culture that placed much of the training and decision-making responsibility squarely on their hands. However, internal and external pressures on management prompted the shift from a form of organising the workplace that could have been characterised as responsible autonomy to a more direct and autocratic form of control. This shift had the effect of destroying the organizational culture and stripping the employees of much of their responsibility for employee socialisation and customer service. The impact of these management initiatives on the employees, clientele and `bottom line' of the nightclub is the major concern of this paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Mike Sosteric, 1996. "Subjectivity and the Labour Process: A Case Study in the Restaurant Industry," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 10(2), pages 297-318, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:10:y:1996:i:2:p:297-318
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/10/2/297.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Armstrong, Peter, 2015. "The discourse of Michel Foucault: A sociological encounter," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 29-42.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:10:y:1996:i:2:p:297-318. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.