IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v30y2026i4p437-448.html

How Continuous Intentions Towards Over the Top Platform are Framed? Stimulus–Organism– Response Model Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Neeraj Dhiman
  • Aayushi Singh
  • Roktim Sarmah

Abstract

The current study attempts to measure the determinants of continuous intention of over-the-top (OTT) platforms. In the present context, stimulus–organism–response (S–O–R) model was applied to identify the determinants of continuous intentions. The data were collected from users of the existing OTT platforms. To test the proposed model, we applied the partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique in accordance with the objective and hypotheses. The proposed model explains 45% of perceived value and 41% of continuance intentions, respectively. The results indicated that there are four significant relationships and one insignificant relationship. To explicitly state; perceived ease of use, perceived customization benefits, mobility has a favorable impact on perceived value, and perceived value significantly influences the continuous intention of OTT platform, and last, entertainment value was found to be insignificant with perceived value. This study provides varied clues to marketers to shape up customers behavior and to ensure the factors affecting decision regarding continuous intention of OTT platform. The current study proposes that continuous intentions can be framed by offering value.

Suggested Citation

  • Neeraj Dhiman & Aayushi Singh & Roktim Sarmah, 2026. "How Continuous Intentions Towards Over the Top Platform are Framed? Stimulus–Organism– Response Model Perspective," Vision, , vol. 30(4), pages 437-448, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:30:y:2026:i:4:p:437-448
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629221104202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722629221104202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722629221104202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:30:y:2026:i:4:p:437-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.