IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v29y2025i3p339-352.html

Significance of Personal and Job Attributes for Managing Employee Wellbeing in the New Work from Home India

Author

Listed:
  • Navya Kumar
  • Swati Alok
  • Sudatta Banerjee

Abstract

Indian employers rapidly adopted work from home (WFH) due to COVID. Now some contemplate long-term, also permanent WFH for select employee segments even post-pandemic, for productivity benefits. But employee wellbeing is critical for productivity. Therefore, this article examines effects of personal and job-related factors on wellbeing for 301 Indian employees placed under WFH during COVID lockdown of early-2020 and longer. Hierarchical linear regression demonstrated that demographically, the presence of elders at home and employment in manufacturing were negatively associated with wellbeing. Among personal attributes, the need for structure (routines) was negatively associated with wellbeing. But the need for autonomy (volition) and job crafting to increase structural job resources (proactively obtaining more responsibility and knowledge) were positively associated with wellbeing. Wellbeing was also positively associated with job-related factors of technology and supervisor support. These findings could inform customization of, and interventions under, organisations’ WFH approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Navya Kumar & Swati Alok & Sudatta Banerjee, 2025. "Significance of Personal and Job Attributes for Managing Employee Wellbeing in the New Work from Home India," Vision, , vol. 29(3), pages 339-352, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:339-352
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629221074917
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722629221074917
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722629221074917?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. T Guimaraes & P Dallow, 1999. "Empirically testing the benefits, problems, and success factors for telecommuting programmes," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 40-54, March.
    2. Eric Brunelle & Jo-Annie Fortin, 2021. "Distance Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: An Examination of Teleworkers’ and Office Workers’ Job Satisfaction Through the Lens of Self-Determination Theory," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, February.
    3. Ellen Baker & Gayle C. Avery & John Crawford, 2006. "Home Alone: The Role of Technology in Telecommuting," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 19(4), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Dhruva Pathak & Vijayakumar Bharathi S. & Padma Mala E., 2021. "The Work-Life Balancing Act: A Study on the Mandatory Work From Home Due to COVID-19 on the IT and Non-IT Industry Sectors," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Zhang, Shihang & Moeckel, Rolf & Moreno, Ana Tsui & Shuai, Bin & Gao, Jie, 2020. "A work-life conflict perspective on telework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 51-68.
    6. Dharma Raju Bathini & George Mathew Kandathil, 2019. "An Orchestrated Negotiated Exchange: Trading Home-Based Telework for Intensified Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 411-423, January.
    7. Hannah M. Schade & Jan Digutsch & Thomas Kleinsorge & Yan Fan, 2021. "Having to Work from Home: Basic Needs, Well-Being, and Motivation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-18, May.
    8. D. Wayne Osgood & Barbara J. McMorris & Maria T. Potenza, 2002. "Analyzing Multiple-Item Measures of Crime and Deviance I: Item Response Theory Scaling," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 267-296, September.
    9. Aarthi Raghavan & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & Serik Orazgaliyev, 2021. "COVID-19 and the New Normal of Organizations and Employees: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ştefan-Alexandru Catană & Sorin-George Toma & Andreea Barbu, 2021. "The Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Teleworking and Education in a Romanian Higher Education Institution: An Internal Stakeholders Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-17, August.
    2. Monica Aureliana Petcu & Maria Iulia Sobolevschi-David & Adrian Anica-Popa & Stefania Cristina Curea & Catalina Motofei & Ana-Maria Popescu, 2021. "Multidimensional Assessment of Job Satisfaction in Telework Conditions. Case Study: Romania in the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Plantinga, Paul & Ayodele, Odilile & Sanchez, Diana Carolina & Daniels, Chux & Davids, Yul Derek & Dlamini, Simangele & Mosiea, Tshepang, 2025. "Can e-participation be a transformative innovation in South African policymaking?," SocArXiv j5s6w_v1, Center for Open Science.
    4. Malik, Ashish & Mahadevan, Jasmin & Sharma, Piyush & Nguyen, Tuyet-Mai, 2021. "Masking, claiming and preventing innovation in cross-border B2B relationships: Neo-colonial frameworks of power in global IT industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 327-339.
    5. Juan Sandoval-Reyes & Sandra Idrovo-Carlier & Edison Jair Duque-Oliva, 2021. "Remote Work, Work Stress, and Work–Life during Pandemic Times: A Latin America Situation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-12, July.
    6. Wang, Richard & Ye, Zhongnan & Lu, Miaojia & Hsu, Shu-Chien, 2022. "Understanding post-pandemic work-from-home behaviours and community level energy reduction via agent-based modelling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    7. Aniela Balacescu & Aurelia Patrascu & Loredana Maria Paunescu, 2021. "Adaptability to Teleworking in European Countries," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(58), pages 683-683, August.
    8. Chloe Maclean & Zara Brodie & Roxanne Hawkins & Jack Cameron McKinlay, 2024. "‘At Times it’s Too Difficult, it is Too Traumatic, it’s Too Much’: The Emotion Work of Domestic Abuse Helpline Staff During Covid-19," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(5), pages 1267-1284, October.
    9. Tachia Chin & Yi Shi & Manlio Giudice & Jianwei Meng & Zeyu Xing, 2023. "Working from anywhere: yin–yang cognition paradoxes of knowledge sharing and hiding for developing careers in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Agnieszka Kasperska & Anna Matysiak & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2024. "Managerial (dis)preferences towards employees working from home: Post-pandemic experimental evidence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-19, May.
    11. Stephanie Wallace & Brian Francis, 2025. "Developing a Complete Sentence Severity Scale using Extended Goodman RC models," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 75-102, March.
    12. Reece Garcia, 2022. "Exploring the domestic division of labor when both parents are involuntarily working from home: The effects of the UK COVID pandemic," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1065-1081, July.
    13. Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez, 2023. "A Configurational Evaluation of Spanish Teleworkers’ Perception and Nonperception of Stress during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, July.
    14. Minh Hieu Nguyen & Jimmy Armoogum, 2021. "Perception and Preference for Home-Based Telework in the COVID-19 Era: A Gender-Based Analysis in Hanoi, Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Seungho Yang & Tanvir Uddin Chowdhury & Ahmad Mohammadi & Peter Y. Park, 2022. "Development of a Method for Evaluating Social Distancing Situations on Urban Streets during a Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-11, July.
    16. Alba Yela Aránega & Clara Gonzalo Montesinos & Raúl Castaño Urueña & Rafael Castaño Sánchez, 2025. "Digitalization intention in entrepreneurs and SMEs: a structural equation model of digital behavior and work-life balance," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Wang, Xinyi & Kim, Sung Hoo & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2024. "Identifying teleworking-related motives and comparing telework frequency expectations in the post-pandemic world: A latent class choice modeling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    18. Alexander T. Vazsonyi & Janice E. Clifford Wittekind & Lara M. Belliston & Timothy D. Van Loh, 2004. "Extending the General Theory of Crime to “The East:” Low Self-Control in Japanese Late Adolescents," Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 189-216, September.
    19. Pan, Yu & He, Sylvia Y., 2022. "Analyzing COVID-19’s impact on the travel mobility of various social groups in China’s Greater Bay Area via mobile phone big data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 263-281.
    20. Hirte, Georg & Laes, Renée & Gerike, Regine, 2023. "Working from self-driving cars," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:29:y:2025:i:3:p:339-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.