IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v26y2022i4p431-440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological Empowerment and Job Satisfaction: A Meta-analytic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Jain Mathew
  • Sridevi Nair

Abstract

Studies in the area of psychological empowerment have been on the rise since early 1990s. Given the large amount of information available, the researchers aim to consolidate findings, in order to arrive at a deeper understanding of the concept and its relation to job satisfaction of employees in organizations. The researchers have identified 50 studies, set in varied cultural and organizational settings. The data from these studies form the basis of the analysis in this paper. A meta-analysis of the findings of the chosen studies was conducted. This is followed by a systematic review of literature, to identify a few probable intervening variables that modify the relationship. The findings of the analysis suggest that the direct relation between psychological empowerment and job satisfaction is positive, strong and statistically significant. The study supports the validity of one of the earliest models explaining the relation. The paper establishes that the direct relation between psychological empowerment and job satisfaction is strong, positive and significant. The variations in the strength of the relationship is due to the presence of certain intervening variables like culture, age, educational qualification and experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Jain Mathew & Sridevi Nair, 2022. "Psychological Empowerment and Job Satisfaction: A Meta-analytic Review," Vision, , vol. 26(4), pages 431-440, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:26:y:2022:i:4:p:431-440
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262921994350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262921994350
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262921994350?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:26:y:2022:i:4:p:431-440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.