IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v26y2022i1p25-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Logic–Based Comparison of Predicted Sales Records of Competing Products

Author

Listed:
  • Anuradha Banerjee

Abstract

The issue of comparing sales records of competitors is gaining increased importance to both marketing academicians and practitioners to get an idea about approximate trend of customer inclination to their products. Actual sales records of competing products for past few years can be compared in two ways. If sales records exhibit normal distribution, then they can be tested for dominance over the other using t test (paired or unpaired). On the other hand, if normality is violated, then non-parametric tests like Kruskal–Wallis test by ranks or one-way ANOVA (analysis of variance) can be applied to test whether samples originate from the same distribution. One-way ANOVA is very flexible in the sense that it can work with two or more independent samples, and sample sizes need not be equal. This article emphasizes the fact that marketing strategies of today must take care of predicted consumer inclination, at least in the near future. Prediction of future sales records of competing products can be obtained using many techniques available in the literature, like linear regression, auto-regressive moving average (ARMA) model etc. All these predictions come up with a certain percentage of error. Therefore, it is wise to fuzzify them by dividing into ranges, before comparison. Here, a novel fuzzy logic–based technique is proposed that compares predicted sales records of competing products and accordingly finds out which one is the best.

Suggested Citation

  • Anuradha Banerjee, 2022. "Fuzzy Logic–Based Comparison of Predicted Sales Records of Competing Products," Vision, , vol. 26(1), pages 25-30, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:26:y:2022:i:1:p:25-30
    DOI: 10.1177/0972262920971473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972262920971473
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972262920971473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:26:y:2022:i:1:p:25-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.