IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/vision/v1y1997i2p71-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Organizational Role Stress as Related to Efficacy Amongst Managers of Government, Public and Private Sectors

Author

Listed:
  • Vidhu Mohan

    (Professor & UGC Project Director, Department of Psychology, Punjab University, Chandigarh)

  • Daisy Chauhan

    (Research Officer, Management Development Institute, Gurgaon.)

Abstract

Optimisation of stress in accordance with one’s personality and environment can lead to best performance. But if stress becomes distress it can cause major handicap in one’s level of performance and productivity. The present study was conducted on middle level managers from Government, Public and Private sectors. They were administered Udai Pareek’s Organizational Role Stress (ORS) and Role Efficacy Scale. The results show that there was no significant difference in these three sectors on Role Efficacy - all the ten dimensions. But as far as stress was concerned, the public sector managers experienced significantly higher stress on Role Erosion and Self-Role Conflict followed by Government and least in the private sector. As far as the correlations were concerned, all the ten sub-scales of ORS were significantly negatively related to the overall index of Role Efficacy and most of its sub-scales.

Suggested Citation

  • Vidhu Mohan & Daisy Chauhan, 1997. "Organizational Role Stress as Related to Efficacy Amongst Managers of Government, Public and Private Sectors," Vision, , vol. 1(2), pages 71-77, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:1:y:1997:i:2:p:71-77
    DOI: 10.1177/09722629X97001002008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722629X97001002008
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722629X97001002008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:vision:v:1:y:1997:i:2:p:71-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.