IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v63y2026i8p1643-1663.html

Lion in a jungle or lion in a cage? Yojana beyond planning power and powerlessness in Bangalore, India

Author

Listed:
  • Jayaraj Sundaresan

Abstract

This article examines the relationship between planning, violations and powerlessness in Bangalore. It argues that although planning power is supposed to be produced in the public administration by urban planners and bureaucrats working with and through different protocols, it is never actually produced in reality. Engaging with this paradox and drawing on Latour and NÄ gÄ rjuna, this article suggests that planning power has no ontological substance and that planning is performatively constituted in real time by diverse collectives. I argue that the millions of observable everyday practices that mutually constitute the social, political and administrative cannot be explained, criticised or controlled by a single concept of ‘planning state power’ as a structural force. Instead, the article proposes Yojana as a context-sensitive vernacular concept to better understand the practice of planning in India and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Jayaraj Sundaresan, 2026. "Lion in a jungle or lion in a cage? Yojana beyond planning power and powerlessness in Bangalore, India," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 63(8), pages 1643-1663, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:63:y:2026:i:8:p:1643-1663
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980251396004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980251396004
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980251396004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:63:y:2026:i:8:p:1643-1663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.