IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v62y2025i8p1630-1649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Neo-collectivisation’ through property rights reforms: Villager empowerment and state building in urbanising China

Author

Listed:
  • Siu Wai Wong

    (The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong)

  • Jinlong Liu

    (Renmin University of China, China)

  • Bo-sin Tang

    (The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong)

Abstract

Over the past two decades, property rights reforms in China’s peri-urban regions have succeeded in granting villagers individual rights to their collective assets. It has been argued that these reforms will lead to the demise of China’s long-established rural collective system. However, based on in-depth research and case studies in southern China, we conclude that these reform initiatives have been upheld by the state and villagers to sustain and improve, rather than destroy, rural collectivism. The implementation of formal titling through shareholding reforms has not engendered full privatisation and the dissolution of collective entities; instead, it has given rise to an alternative form of rural collectivity that has reshaped the power dynamics between the state and the villagers in daily governance. While this ‘neo-collectivist’ approach appears to have empowered villagers by enhancing their rights to collective assets and benefits, it has also strengthened the governing capacity of the socialist state by extending and legitimising its interventions in Chinese rural communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Siu Wai Wong & Jinlong Liu & Bo-sin Tang, 2025. "‘Neo-collectivisation’ through property rights reforms: Villager empowerment and state building in urbanising China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(8), pages 1630-1649, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:8:p:1630-1649
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241296316
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241296316
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241296316?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:8:p:1630-1649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.