IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v62y2025i7p1397-1416.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Migration and neighbourhood trust: Evidence from urban China

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaobin Zhang

    (Lanzhou University, China)

  • Linlin Zhang

    (Hangzhou City University, China)

  • Xiaoqiang Shen

    (Lanzhou University, China)

  • Huiling Huang

    (Heilongjiang University of Science and Technology, China)

Abstract

Neighbourhood outcomes of migration have drawn considerable scholarly attention. Previous studies consider neighbourhood trust an indicator of social integration or social resources, revealing inconclusive findings regarding the effects of migration. Unlike previous studies, we view neighbourhood trust as a lifestyle feature. Combining urbanism theory and a typology of trust, we argue that migration causes a reduction in migrants’ neighbourhood trust through the assimilation of the urbanism lifestyle. We provide nationwide empirical evidence of the causal relationship between migration and neighbourhood trust and reveal the underlying mechanism. Our study identifies this relationship in urban China by applying a difference-in-differences empirical strategy and using the China Family Panel Survey. The results show that migration lowers neighbourhood trust levels by 0.473 from a sample mean of 6.692. We find that the declining effect is greater for rural–urban migrants than for within-urban migrants, and it is greater for rural–urban migrants who acquire urban hukou than for those who do not. We also show that rural–urban migration leads to an increase in trust in strangers. Together, these results support our hypothesis that the assimilation of the urbanism lifestyle is a critical mechanism through which migration undermines neighbourhood trust.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaobin Zhang & Linlin Zhang & Xiaoqiang Shen & Huiling Huang, 2025. "Migration and neighbourhood trust: Evidence from urban China," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(7), pages 1397-1416, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:7:p:1397-1416
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241288473
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241288473
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241288473?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:7:p:1397-1416. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.