IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v62y2025i7p1358-1374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The entrepreneurial creative city and its discontents: The politics of art-led urban regeneration in Incheon, South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Se Hoon Park

    (Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements, The Republic of Korea)

  • HaeRan Shin

    (Seoul National University, The Republic of Korea)

Abstract

The increasing occurrence of discontent and conflict regarding making creative cities across the globe has led scholars to pay significant attention to the political dimension of creative-city policies. This study, by exploring the controversy over the Incheon Art Platform, a warehouse-turned art space in Incheon, South Korea, offers a situated understanding of how the city government’s entrepreneurial approach to the creative city was resisted and reinterpreted by local civil society groups. Against the backdrop of enhanced urban entrepreneurialism and the rise of civil activism in Incheon, the arrival of the creative city concept has generated opposing interpretations of the role of art and culture between the city government and civil society groups. Given the state’s expansionist policy toward the cultural sector in the nation, the entrepreneurial version of a creative city was first resisted by local cultural actors along with government-sponsored artists and subsequently sparked an artist-inspired anti-entrepreneurism protest in the city. This paper demonstrated how the creative city became a subject of political struggle within the unique relationship between the state and the cultural sector in South Korea, thereby contributing to enriching global urban knowledge on making and remaking creative cities beyond the Global North.

Suggested Citation

  • Se Hoon Park & HaeRan Shin, 2025. "The entrepreneurial creative city and its discontents: The politics of art-led urban regeneration in Incheon, South Korea," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(7), pages 1358-1374, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:7:p:1358-1374
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241285856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241285856
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241285856?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:7:p:1358-1374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.