IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v62y2025i6p1141-1167.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Have City Deals delivered higher productivity in England? An empirical assessment of a broad-spectrum local growth policy

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay I Raja

    (University of Cambridge, UK)

  • Johan P Larsson

    (University of Cambridge, UK
    The Ratio Institute)

Abstract

The issue of what constitutes effective regional growth policy has remained elusive, particularly for ‘broad-spectrum’ policy aimed at a large part of a country. We undertake one of the first quantitative studies looking at the City Deals in England, analysing effects on productivity. We employ a difference-in-differences model, an event study, and a synthetic control method to evaluate effects on productivity. The results are mixed and usually not statistically different from zero. While the difference-in-differences framework indicates some positive effects, possibly driven by places that were the most productive before the intervention, the event study and synthetic control methods point to, at best, small effects that diminish over time. Our findings, therefore, question the efficacy of such deals in terms of narrowing the UK’s longstanding regional inequalities, while opening up several avenues for further research to understand what worked and what did not within a ‘broad-spectrum’ local growth strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay I Raja & Johan P Larsson, 2025. "Have City Deals delivered higher productivity in England? An empirical assessment of a broad-spectrum local growth policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(6), pages 1141-1167, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:6:p:1141-1167
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241270993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241270993
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241270993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:6:p:1141-1167. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.