IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v62y2025i14p2725-2747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neoliberalism as space fragmentation: A Lefebvrian gaze at post-socialist urban transitions

Author

Listed:
  • Guido Sechi

    (University of Latvia, Latvia)

  • Oleg Golubchikov

    (Cardiff University, UK)

Abstract

Urban studies have recently seen the emergence of perspectives that question the applicability of neoliberalism to the experiences of post-socialist states. This article offers conceptual clarifications in this regard. The work of Henri Lefebvre helps explicate the role of ‘the urban’ in making neoliberalism a ‘hidden ideology’ governing everyday consciousness and subjectivities. This argument is illustrated by a study of residential space fragmentation, empirically addressed through three themes: (a) housing governance fragmentation, (b) enclosure of common spaces and (c) aesthetic differentiation of residential space and the spatialisation of class. The study demonstrates how the integrated system of urban welfare infrastructure built in the Soviet city has been fragmented, enclosed and repurposed in order to be compliant with commodification, privatism and insulative particularism. The spatial fragmentation is argued to be an active practice that helps internalise the neoliberal ‘common sense’ in everyday life.

Suggested Citation

  • Guido Sechi & Oleg Golubchikov, 2025. "Neoliberalism as space fragmentation: A Lefebvrian gaze at post-socialist urban transitions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(14), pages 2725-2747, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:14:p:2725-2747
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980251322410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980251322410
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980251322410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:14:p:2725-2747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.