Author
Listed:
- Florian Koch
(University of Applied Sciences HTW Berlin, Germany)
- Sarah Beyer
(University of Applied Sciences HTW Berlin, Germany)
Abstract
Google’s Environmental Insights Explorer (EIE) exemplifies a tech-down approach by leveraging proprietary data, machine learning and artificial intelligence to analyse urban greenhouse gas emissions, solar potential and tree canopy coverage. While framed as a tool for cities to assess and improve sustainability, the EIE often overlooks localised contexts and depends on opaque data generation processes that follow commercial interests. This study evaluates the EIE’s data assemblage through critical urban data studies, focusing on its technical and contextual stacks. It critiques the EIE’s lack of transparency, dependence on proprietary data and marginalisation of local expertise. Despite its promise, the EIE raises significant concerns about power imbalances, data validity and urban governance implications. Cities utilising the EIE must reconcile its global standardisation with specific local needs, navigating a complex landscape shaped by Google’s corporate interests. The findings highlight the need for a more inclusive, context-specific approach to urban sustainability metrics that balances innovative data use with transparency and equitable stakeholder engagement. The EIE demonstrates how sustainability indicators and data are defined through a technology-driven process shaped by a private company, while neglecting local knowledge and narratives. This process – referred to as a tech-down approach – differs from both bottom-up and top-down methods of sustainability indicator selection, as well as from data philanthropy initiatives by private companies, due to its exclusive reliance on corporate data and its global scope. This study urges critical reflection on the broader implications of tech-driven urban monitoring tools like the EIE.
Suggested Citation
Florian Koch & Sarah Beyer, 2025.
"A gift from heaven: Google’s Environmental Insights Explorer and its tech-down approach to monitor urban sustainability beyond local contexts,"
Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(13), pages 2633-2651, October.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:13:p:2633-2651
DOI: 10.1177/00420980251340280
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:13:p:2633-2651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.