Author
Abstract
The prevailing discourse in urban planning often relegates the concept of ‘urban informality’ to its margins, typically viewing it as an aberration or market failure needing correction rather than a developmental phase warranting integration. While studies and policies of urban redevelopment have shifted from large-scale, clean-sweep practices to less radical, sustainable regeneration approaches, the local variations and fiscal complexity of these informal settlements render it onerous to find an adaptive spatial governance mode. Focussing on urban villages in Shenzhen, China, this study integrates the concept of the ‘form-context ensemble’ with spatial equilibrium models, thus proposing a revised framework that better accommodates the irregularities (hyper-density but below-market prices) introduced by urban informality with empirical evidence. Our empirical analysis shows that dense settlements under the expected value curve (EVC) can help mitigate housing cost disparities between income groups, while redevelopment will bring the externality to shift the EVC to a higher level, thus enlarging the discrepancy. We propose a three-way trade-off matrix between value, access and amenity for assessing the utility of urban villages, providing a comprehensive framework for balancing various factors in housing policy design and delivery. Our findings suggest that preserving some imformal settlements may enahnce general welfare and economic equity, even as cities pursue selective formalization. This paves the way for adopting a classification scheme and concerted measures for making targeted regeneration policies from municipal management or planning perspectives.
Suggested Citation
Yihao Wu, 2025.
"Housing market with informal density agglomeration: Investigating the form-context transition of urban village in China,"
Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(11), pages 2309-2327, August.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:11:p:2309-2327
DOI: 10.1177/00420980241309908
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:11:p:2309-2327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.