IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v62y2025i10p2046-2068.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do land supply restrictions promote structural transformation and urban sustainability in Chinese megacities? A quasi-experimental analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yudan Cheng

    (Central University of Finance and Economics, China)

  • Xueyang Geng

    (Xi’an University of Finance and Economics, China)

  • Wenjia Tian

    (Central University of Finance and Economics, China)

Abstract

This article examines the socioeconomic impacts of the 2014 policy that imposed restrictions on new construction land in Chinese megacities, emphasising the pivotal role of quantitative land supply regulations in land allocation and industrial structural transformation. The policy restrictions on expanding construction lands likely prompted local governments in these megacities to prioritise reallocating land to the tertiary sector, which is recognised for its higher efficiency in land use. This study employs a synthetic control method to empirically assess the policy’s effects. The findings indicate that the policy significantly fostered the transition of both land and ISs towards the tertiary sector, particularly in megacities at the early stages of structural transformation. The mechanism analysis indicates that the primary economic benefits of the policy derive from industrial structural change, rather than improvements in intra-industry land use efficiency or changes in sectoral relative prices. Additionally, this article provides supporting evidence of the policy’s positive impact on sustainable development, demonstrated by improvements in income and reductions in environmental pollution. Nevertheless, it also highlights a potential risk of increased inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • Yudan Cheng & Xueyang Geng & Wenjia Tian, 2025. "Do land supply restrictions promote structural transformation and urban sustainability in Chinese megacities? A quasi-experimental analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(10), pages 2046-2068, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:10:p:2046-2068
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241298604
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241298604
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241298604?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:62:y:2025:i:10:p:2046-2068. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.