IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v59y2022i13p2756-2773.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effects of social housing regeneration schemes on employment: The case of the Glasgow Stock Transfer

Author

Listed:
  • Meng Le Zhang

    (Sheffield University, UK)

  • George Galster

    (Wayne State University, USA)

  • David Manley

    (University of Bristol, UK)

  • Gwilym Pryce

    (University of Sheffield, UK)

Abstract

Regeneration is an internationally popular policy for improving distressed neighbourhoods dominated by large social housing developments. Stimulating employment is often touted as a secondary benefit, but this claim has rarely been evaluated convincingly. In 2003, Glasgow City Council transferred ownership of its entire social housing stock to the Glasgow Housing Association and over £4 billion was invested in physical repairs, social services and other regeneration activities. Using a linked census database of individuals (Scottish Longitudinal Study), we evaluate the causal effect of the Stock Transfer on employment in Glasgow through a quasi-experimental design that exploits idiosyncrasies and changes in Glasgow’s administrative boundaries. We find that the Stock Transfer had a positive effect on employment for Glasgow residents who were not living in transferred social housing stock. We establish that this effect was mainly accomplished through the local employment multiplier effect of capital spending rather than through any other programmatic elements of the Stock Transfer. Exploratory analysis shows heterogeneous effects: individuals who were over 21, female, living with dependent children and with less education were less likely to benefit from the intervention. We did not find significant subgroup effects by neighbourhood deprivation.

Suggested Citation

  • Meng Le Zhang & George Galster & David Manley & Gwilym Pryce, 2022. "The effects of social housing regeneration schemes on employment: The case of the Glasgow Stock Transfer," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(13), pages 2756-2773, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:13:p:2756-2773
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980211047044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980211047044
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980211047044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:13:p:2756-2773. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.