IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v59y2022i10p2018-2035.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple problematisations: The logics governing wet markets in two Chinese cities

Author

Listed:
  • Shuru Zhong

    (Sun Yat-Sen University, China)

  • Yulin Chen

    (Tsinghua University, China)

  • Guojun Zeng

    (Sun Yat-Sen University, China)

Abstract

Wet markets serve as a cornerstone of food distribution in China but are increasingly being threatened by urban displacement. This study explores the various motivations for local governments in Sanya City and Beijing City to enact aggressive policies limiting wet markets, the dynamic nature of the governing process and the multifaceted impacts such governance has on the everyday practices of vendors and consumers. Drawing upon Foucault’s notion of problematisation, this study found that wet markets have become representations of ‘problems’ such as insanitation and disorder, lowlands of economic revenue and ‘low-skilled industry’. Specific governance is regularly entangled with multiple means of problematisation, shaped and conditioned by forces such as administrative capacity, policy intensity, market configuration, business activism and consumer demand, as well as the interrelationships among them. Current governance is attempting to ‘correct’ wet markets to desired forms, but ignores the holistic value they embed in urban life. Thus, this research suggests more inclusive governance and sustainable development with regards to wet markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuru Zhong & Yulin Chen & Guojun Zeng, 2022. "Multiple problematisations: The logics governing wet markets in two Chinese cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(10), pages 2018-2035, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:10:p:2018-2035
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980211028115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980211028115
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980211028115?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:10:p:2018-2035. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.