IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v59y2022i10p1998-2017.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cultural practices and rough sociality in Mexico’s midsize cities: Tijuana, Puebla and Monterrey

Author

Listed:
  • Leandro Rodriguez-Medina

    (Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Mexico)

  • María Emilia Ismael Simental

    (Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico)

  • Alberto Javier López Cuenca

    (Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Mexico)

  • Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja

    (Universidad de las Américas Puebla, Mexico)

Abstract

It is frequently claimed that cultural agents are necessary to sustain and strengthen the social fabric, to guarantee economic growth and social development and to consolidate knowledge economies based on innovation. These arguments tend to avoid inquiring what kind of sociality these cultural actors are enacting. To address this point, we researched three Mexican midsize cities: Puebla, Tijuana, and Monterrey, between 1984 and 2017. Sociality produced by cultural dynamics, sponsored either by the public (cultural policy) or the private sector (cultural market), is generally characterised by a focus on social order, the construction of local identity, a hygienic view of public space and disempowerment of local actors. Differing from these views, our research has found a new form of sociality that we call ‘rough sociality’, produced by cultural agents from civil society. This sociality is conflictive, ephemeral, spatially bounded and affective, which has implications not only for the cultural work but, most importantly, for the social relations and the being/doing-togetherness that such work may enact and reproduce.

Suggested Citation

  • Leandro Rodriguez-Medina & María Emilia Ismael Simental & Alberto Javier López Cuenca & Anne Kristiina Kurjenoja, 2022. "Cultural practices and rough sociality in Mexico’s midsize cities: Tijuana, Puebla and Monterrey," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(10), pages 1998-2017, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:10:p:1998-2017
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980211026544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980211026544
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980211026544?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:59:y:2022:i:10:p:1998-2017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.