IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v43y2006i5-6p879-901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rethinking Urban Incivility Research: Strangers, Bodies and Circulations

Author

Listed:
  • Timothy Phillips

    (Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, timothy.phillips@anu.edu.au)

  • Philip Smith

    (Department of Sociology, Yale University, PO Box 208265, New Haven, CT 06520-8265, USA, philip.smith@yale.edu)

Abstract

Research on urban incivility has made progress but has limited scope thanks to a stereotyped and policy-relevant focus on problem neighbourhoods and urban renewal. It also lacks benchmark comparative data, has almost nothing to say about interpersonal incivility and is experiencing diminishing returns to effort. A new agenda is proposed that explores everyday life incivility as this is experienced over the broader population in the course of daily routine. The Everyday Life Incivility in Australia Survey is introduced. This was a random national sample survey collecting systematic narrative information on interpersonal encounters involving a rude stranger. Findings from the study are reported here, documenting the range of low-level incivilities experienced in daily life and outlining some of their properties. The results challenge received wisdom about the corrosive effects of urban incivility on society.

Suggested Citation

  • Timothy Phillips & Philip Smith, 2006. "Rethinking Urban Incivility Research: Strangers, Bodies and Circulations," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 43(5-6), pages 879-901, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:5-6:p:879-901
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980600676196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980600676196
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980600676196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Melissa Butcher & Luke Dickens, 2016. "Spatial Dislocation and Affective Displacement: Youth Perspectives on Gentrification in London," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 800-816, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:5-6:p:879-901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.