IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v42y2005i5-6p889-911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Interruptions: Testing the Rhetoric of Culturally Led Urban Development

Author

Listed:
  • Malcolm Miles

    (School of Art and Performance, Faculty of Arts, University of Plymouth, Earl Richards Road North, Exeter, EX2 6AS, UK, m.f.miles@plymouth.ac.uk)

Abstract

Since the 1980s, the cultural industries have gained a key role in strategies to deal with urban problems, seen as able to provide a new economic base in post-industrial settings. Cases of flagship cultural institutions such as Tate Modern or the Guggenheim in Bilbao imply that a cultural turn in urban policy delivers urban revitalisation. Following the turn in Glasgow's fortunes after being European Capital of Culture in 1990, it is easy to understand how city authorities and developers alike are captivated by cultural projects. But there are questions: is advocacy for the creative industries to be trusted? To what extent can policies and strategies which are successful in one city be mapped onto others? And to what extent do cultural producers, such as artists, subscribe to the party line? An increasing number of voices of dissent in the arts suggest an alternative approach to urban regeneration. This paper questions the rhetoric of the cultural industries and investigates emerging alternative scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Malcolm Miles, 2005. "Interruptions: Testing the Rhetoric of Culturally Led Urban Development," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 42(5-6), pages 889-911, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:5-6:p:889-911
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980500107375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980500107375
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980500107375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lauren Andres & Oleg Golubchikov, 2016. "The Limits to Artist-Led Regeneration: Creative Brownfields in the Cities of High Culture," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 757-775, July.
    2. Meghan Ashlin Rich & William Tsitsos, 2016. "Avoiding the ‘SoHo Effect’ in Baltimore: Neighborhood Revitalization and Arts and Entertainment Districts," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 736-756, July.
    3. Ron Boschma & Simona Iammarino & Raffaele Paci & Jordy Suriñach & Jasper f. Meekes & Dorina M. Buda & Gert De Roo, 2017. "Leeuwarden 2018: Complexity of Leisure-Led Regional Development in A European Capital of Culture," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 108(1), pages 129-136, February.
    4. Zhe Liu & Pieter Uyttenhove & Xin Zheng, 2018. "Moving Urban Sculptures towards Sustainability: The Urban Sculpture Planning System in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-24, December.
    5. HaeRan Shin & Quentin Stevens, 2013. "How Culture and Economy Meet in South Korea: The Politics of Cultural Economy in Culture-led Urban Regeneration," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1707-1723, September.
    6. Vanessa Mathews, 2014. "Incoherence and Tension in Culture-Led Redevelopment," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(3), pages 1019-1036, May.
    7. Sihvonen, Tanja & Cnossen, Boukje, 2016. "Not only a workplace : Reshaping creative work and urban space," Other publications TiSEM ed1326b7-ed1a-4b44-a4b5-d, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:5-6:p:889-911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.