IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v38y2001i2p367-376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assistive Technology and the Barrier-free City: A Case Study from Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Peter Neumann

    (Centre for Applied Spatial Analysis, University of Muenster, Robert-Koch-Str. 26, 48149 Muenster, Germany, neumanp@uni-muenster.de)

  • Christoph Uhlenkueken

    (Centre for Applied Spatial Analysis, University of Muenster, Robert-Koch-Str. 26, 48149 Muenster, Germany, hlenku@uni-muenster.de)

Abstract

The paper investigates how far the state-of-the-art technology of the internet can contribute to the creation of a barrier-free city. The paper begins with a discussion of the general possibilities and potential of the internet for disabled people. This discussion is followed by a presentation of the significance of internet technologies for disabled people and urban development. The practical application of the approach will then be illustrated by means of a case study: the KOMM project in Muenster, Germany. The paper concludes with an evaluation of the potential and the limits of the internet for a barrier-free city.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Neumann & Christoph Uhlenkueken, 2001. "Assistive Technology and the Barrier-free City: A Case Study from Germany," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(2), pages 367-376, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:2:p:367-376
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980123806
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980123806
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980123806?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:2:p:367-376. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.