IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v37y2000i2p391-409.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Windfall Sites for Housing: An Underestimated Resource

Author

Listed:
  • William Walton

    (Department of Geography, University of Aberdeen, St Mary's, King's College, Old Aberdeen, AB24 3UF, UK, w.walton@abdn.ac.uk)

Abstract

The current government has stated that at least 60 per cent of the projected 4.4 million new houses required between 1991 and 2016 should be built on 'brownfield' sites. Many of these sites will be 'windfall' sites—i.e. sites which unexpectedly become available for redevelopment during the plan period. Current government planning policy guidance in both England and Scotland places a significant restriction on the allowances that might be made by local authorities for windfall sites when preparing their strategic land-use development plans and their housing land audits. The effect of this policy restriction is to pressurise local authorities into releasing larger areas of open countryside for housing development than is mathematically necessary. This paper provides a detailed analysis of the allowances for windfall sites made over a 12-year period by the former Grampian Regional Council for the Aberdeen area of north-east Scotland and contrasts this against actual levels of windfall development. It concludes that far more open countryside has been allocated for development than has actually been required and recommends the adoption of a more incrementalist and cautious approach to land release.

Suggested Citation

  • William Walton, 2000. "Windfall Sites for Housing: An Underestimated Resource," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(2), pages 391-409, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:37:y:2000:i:2:p:391-409
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098002249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098002249
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098002249?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:37:y:2000:i:2:p:391-409. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.