IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v36y1999i11p1891-1906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Searching for the Sustainable City: Competing Philosophical Rationales and Processes of 'Ideological Capture' in Adelaide, South Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Haughton

    (CUDEM, School of Built Environment, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds LS1 3HE, UK, g.haughton@lmu.ac.uk)

Abstract

The growing debate around sustainable cities has generated a substantial academic and policy literature. It is becoming increasingly clear that there are a number of different approaches being considered. This article develops four models of sustainable urban development from this literature, ranging from light green to deep green in their underlying environmental philosophy. The models are then used as the framework for analysing four different experiments in sustainable urban development in the city of Adelaide, South Australia, which broadly fit into the four models. Overall, the models are useful in highlighting the different underlying rationales of the four approaches, although they also show that in the process of trying to gain political favour there is a fair amount of 'ideological capture' in respect of the rhetorics and the practice of sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Haughton, 1999. "Searching for the Sustainable City: Competing Philosophical Rationales and Processes of 'Ideological Capture' in Adelaide, South Australia," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(11), pages 1891-1906, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:36:y:1999:i:11:p:1891-1906
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098992665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098992665
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098992665?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:36:y:1999:i:11:p:1891-1906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.