IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v34y1997i3p441-452.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Housing in Singapore: Interpreting 'Quality' in the 1990s

Author

Listed:
  • Teo Siew Eng

    (Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260)

  • Lily Kong

    (Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, geokongl@nus.sg)

Abstract

While writings exist on various aspects of public housing in Singapore, recent developments in the 1990s have not yet been given any serious academic attention. Our intention in this paper is to focus on such developments, paying particular attention to the government's policy of providing quality housing. After setting the context of efforts at providing quality in the first three decades of public housing by the Housing and Development Board, we turn our attention specifically to the 1990s, focusing on three areas in which attempts are being made to improve quality, namely, the physical upgrading of older estates, the privatisation of HUDC flats, and the invention of new schemes such as the executive condominium concept. In the final section, we argue that, as in earlier decades, such efforts belie a hegemonic intent, essentially to manage Singaporeans' growing aspirations and thus to gain political legitimacy for the government. This we term the 'politics of quality' in public housing. We then discuss briefly some reactions to such attempts at hegemony.

Suggested Citation

  • Teo Siew Eng & Lily Kong, 1997. "Public Housing in Singapore: Interpreting 'Quality' in the 1990s," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(3), pages 441-452, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:34:y:1997:i:3:p:441-452
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098976069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098976069
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098976069?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:34:y:1997:i:3:p:441-452. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.