IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v31y1994i3p447-463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Rented Housing: Valuable Asset or Unsustainable Burden?

Author

Listed:
  • Frans M. Dieleman

    (Faculty of Geographical Sciences, University of Utrecht, PO Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The Netherlands has maintained a high degree of intervention in the housing market through the 1980s. It also has a very large social rented sector which comprises 40 per cent of the total housing stock. The housing market regulation and the construction of large quantities of non-profit housing have created a stable level of production of new dwellings and an affordable housing stock. The large social rented sector offers shelter to a large population of low-income households; but it also accommodates many median and high-income groups, thereby avoiding extreme forms of housing segregation. Housing subsidies are a heavy burden on the national budget. A process of financial disengagement of the national government and the housing associations has been started. This will increase the independence of the non-profit housing sector from the political process, but will also lead to higher financial risks for the associations and more instability in this sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Frans M. Dieleman, 1994. "Social Rented Housing: Valuable Asset or Unsustainable Burden?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(3), pages 447-463, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:31:y:1994:i:3:p:447-463
    DOI: 10.1080/00420989420080421
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989420080421
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420989420080421?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas S. Nesslein, 1988. "Housing : The Market Versus the Welfare State Model Revisited," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 25(2), pages 95-108, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Keith Pezzoli & Rob Atkinson & Alisdair Rogers & Alan March & Henry L. Taylor JR & Thomas S. Nesslein & Thomas B. Fischer & R.N. Sharma & Hartmut Häussermann, 2002. "Book Reviews," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(13), pages 2553-2570, December.
    2. Yuzhe Wu & Jia Ao & Yuhang Ren, 2023. "Allocation of Land Factors in China Looking Forward to 2035: Planning and Market," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Thomas S. Nesslein, 2003. "Markets versus Planning: An Assessment of the Swedish Housing Model in the Post-war Period," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(7), pages 1259-1282, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:31:y:1994:i:3:p:447-463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.