IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v29y1992i8p1329-1339.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Economics of Planning Gain: a re-appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • John Bowers

    (School of Business and Economic Studies, The University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK)

Abstract

This paper is a critical examination of certain aspects of the literature on the economics of planning gain. The principal question it addresses is whether the introduction of planning gain into the planning process is likely to enhance consumer welfare.

Suggested Citation

  • John Bowers, 1992. "The Economics of Planning Gain: a re-appraisal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(8), pages 1329-1339, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:29:y:1992:i:8:p:1329-1339
    DOI: 10.1080/00420989220081311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989220081311
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420989220081311?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hugo Priemus & Erik Louw, 2002. "Recovery of land costs: a land policy instrument missing in the Netherlands?," European Journal of Housing Policy, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 2(2), pages 127-146.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:29:y:1992:i:8:p:1329-1339. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.