IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v29y1992i5p687-699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Private and Social Costs of Planning Delay

Author

Listed:
  • Geoffrey Keogh

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Urban and Regional Studies, University of Reading, PO Box 219, Reading RG6 2BU, UK)

  • Alan W. Evans

    (Department of Economics, Faculty of Urban and Regional Studies, University of Reading, PO Box 219, Reading RG6 2BU, UK)

Abstract

This paper examines planning delay and identifies the difficulty in establishing an appropriate definition and measure of delay. It then outlines an economic framework for the analysis of delay costs, distinguishing between private costs and the various elements of social cost. It shows that the costs of delay are contingent upon the restrictiveness of planning and should be assessed in relation to the benefits of planning control. Available estimates of delay cost are identified, but are shown to be deficient even as measures of the private cost of delay. Various suggestions are made for the improvement of existing approaches, but it is concluded that the assessment of private and social delay costs requires case-study research which distinguishes between property sectors, locations and different points in the cycle of property development.

Suggested Citation

  • Geoffrey Keogh & Alan W. Evans, 1992. "The Private and Social Costs of Planning Delay," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 687-699, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:29:y:1992:i:5:p:687-699
    DOI: 10.1080/00420989220080631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989220080631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420989220080631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:29:y:1992:i:5:p:687-699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.