IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v18y1981i1p57-71.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of the Inner City in the Development of Manufacturing Industry

Author

Listed:
  • B.M. Nicholson

    (Environmental Economics at the University of Reading)

  • Ian Brinkley

    (Association of Independent Businesses)

  • Alan W. Evans

    (Centre for Environmental Studies)

Abstract

The first section of the paper surveys the evidence relating to the hypothesis that the inner city acts as a nursery for new manufacturing firms and shows that there is little direct confirmatory evidence. The second and third sections report on two research studies of new firm foundation in London. In the first study it is shown that few manufacturing firms have been set up in inner London in recent years, the majority being in the 'inner city industries' of printing, clothing, etc. In the second the founders of new manufacturing firms, not in the inner city industries, were located and interviewed to find out the reasons for their choice of location. The two studies together tend to refute the inner city nursery hypothesis.

Suggested Citation

  • B.M. Nicholson & Ian Brinkley & Alan W. Evans, 1981. "The Role of the Inner City in the Development of Manufacturing Industry," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 18(1), pages 57-71, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:18:y:1981:i:1:p:57-71
    DOI: 10.1080/00420988120080051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420988120080051
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420988120080051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon C. Cameron, 1973. "Intraurban Location And The New Plant," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 125-143, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew Hildreth, 1991. "Introduction," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 28(6), pages 847-852, December.
    2. Luis Suarez-Villa & Ruth Rama, 1996. "Outsourcing, R&D and the Pattern of Intra-metropolitan Location: The Electronics Industries of Madrid," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1155-1197, August.
    3. J.J. Fagg, 1980. "A Re-examination of the Incubator Hypothesis: A Case Study of Greater Leicester," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 17(1), pages 35-44, February.
    4. Allen J. Scott, 1982. "Locational Patterns and Dynamics of Industrial Activity in the Modern Metropolis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 19(2), pages 111-141, May.
    5. Robert A. Leone & Raymond Struyk, 1976. "The Incubator Hypothesis: Evidence from Five SMSAs," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 13(3), pages 325-331, October.
    6. P.E. Lloyd, 1979. "The Components of Industrial Change for Merseyside Inner Area: 1966-1975," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 16(1), pages 45-60, February.
    7. Luis Suarez-Villa & Wallace Walrod, 1997. "Operational Strategy, R&D and Intra-metropolitan Clustering in a Polycentric Structure: The Advanced Electronics Industries of the Los Angeles Basin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(9), pages 1343-1380, August.
    8. Chakarin Bejrananda & Yuk Lee & Thanchanok Khamkaew, 2015. "The Spatial Pattern of Economic Rents of An Airport Development Area: Lessons Learned from the Suvarnabhumi International Airport, Thailand," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 2604285, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:18:y:1981:i:1:p:57-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.