IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v16y1979i3p273-289.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Area Analysis and Planning Research

Author

Listed:
  • T.S. Brindley

    (Building Research Establishment)

  • J.W. Raine

    (Building Research Establishment)

Abstract

This paper appraises the potential of social area analysis - the identification and description of areas according to their social characteristics - for planning and policy-related research. The development of social area analysis is briefly described, from its roots in pre-war urban sociology into its modern form as a research method based on multivariate statistical techniques, notably principal components analysis and cluster analysis. A number of applications of this method in mainly British planning experience are then described, and the main strengths and weaknesses of social area analysis are considered in terms of the problems of interpreting the results, its accessibility for potential users and the utility of the method for typical planning research problems. A number of further applications are considered and the conclusion is drawn that social area analysis has limited but important uses for a wide variety of planning research exercises.

Suggested Citation

  • T.S. Brindley & J.W. Raine, 1979. "Social Area Analysis and Planning Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 16(3), pages 273-289, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:16:y:1979:i:3:p:273-289
    DOI: 10.1080/713702552
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/713702552
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/713702552?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Michael Carley, 1981. "Political and bureaucratic dilemmas in social indicators for policy making," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 15-33, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:16:y:1979:i:3:p:273-289. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.