IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v30y2024i4p487-502.html

Contingent workers and innovative digital collective action in Europe. Exploring inclusiveness through political intersectionality

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Arcidiacono

    (University of Catania, Italy)

  • Cecilia Manzo

    (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy)

Abstract

According to many scholars, digitalisation generates new inequalities that intersect and stratify old ones, and endangers the exercise of collective voice and the role of unions. This article aims to reverse this perspective by exploring how digital technology could strengthen collective action. To this end, we adopt a political intersectional approach as a framework to assess whether the case studies considered in this article represent more inclusive ways of engaging different marginalised groups situated at the intersection of various forms of inequality. Our analysis draws on 13 case studies involving platforms and digital tools used as strategic devices to aggregate and support intermittent and contingent workers across five EU countries: France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Bulgaria. The findings suggest that digitalisation holds significant potential for fostering new forms of worker action and representation. However, many social groups remain marginalised, even when their specific conditions or demands are strongly articulated in an effort to drive regulatory and policy responses.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Arcidiacono & Cecilia Manzo, 2024. "Contingent workers and innovative digital collective action in Europe. Exploring inclusiveness through political intersectionality," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 30(4), pages 487-502, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:30:y:2024:i:4:p:487-502
    DOI: 10.1177/10242589251318661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10242589251318661
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/10242589251318661?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lorenzo Cini & Vincenzo Maccarrone & Arianna Tassinari, 2022. "With or without U(nions)? Understanding the diversity of gig workers’ organizing practices in Italy and the UK," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(3), pages 341-362, September.
    2. repec:osf:socarx:k3hy4_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Agnieszka Piasna & Jan Drahokoupil, 2017. "Gender inequalities in the new world of work," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(3), pages 313-332, August.
    4. Hyman, Richard & Gumbrell-McCormick, Rebecca, 2017. "Resisting labour market insecurity: old and new actors, rivals or allies?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84658, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Tubaro, Paola & Coville, Marion & Le Ludec, Clément & Casilli, Antonio A., 2022. "Hidden inequalities: The gendered labour of women on micro-tasking platforms," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26.
    6. Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2018. "Flexibility in the Gig Economy: Managing Time on Three Online Piecework Platforms," SocArXiv k3hy4, Center for Open Science.
    7. Lorenzo Cini & Bartek Goldmann, 2021. "The Worker Capabilities Approach: Insights from Worker Mobilizations in Italian Logistics and Food Delivery," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(5), pages 948-967, October.
    8. Paolo Borghi & Annalisa Murgia & Mathilde Mondon-Navazo & Petr Mezihorak, 2021. "Mind the gap between discourses and practices: Platform workers’ representation in France and Italy," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 27(4), pages 425-443, December.
    9. Wood, Alex & Lehdonvirta, Vili, 2021. "Antagonism beyond employment: how the ‘subordinated agency’ of labour platforms generates conflict in the remote gig economy," SocArXiv y943w, Center for Open Science.
    10. Sarah Abdelnour & Émilien Julliard & Dominique Méda, 2023. "Promoting employed worker status on digital platforms: how France’s labour inspection and social security agencies address ‘uberisation’," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 29(3), pages 339-354, August.
    11. repec:osf:socarx:y943w_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Mark Graham & Isis Hjorth & Vili Lehdonvirta, 2017. "Digital labour and development: impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(2), pages 135-162, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonzalez-Cabello, Martin & Siddiq, Auyon & Corbett, Charles J. & Hu, Catherine, 2025. "Fairness in crowdwork: Making the human AI supply chain more humane," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 645-657.
    2. Francesca Bellesia & Elisa Mattarelli & Fabiola Bertolotti, 2023. "Algorithms and their Affordances: How Crowdworkers Manage Algorithmic Scores in Online Labour Markets," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 1-37, January.
    3. Heiland, Heiner, 2020. "Workers' Voice in platform labour: An Overview," WSI Studies 21, The Institute of Economic and Social Research (WSI), Hans Böckler Foundation.
    4. Paula McDonald & Penny Williams & Robyn Mayes, 2021. "Means of Control in the Organization of Digitally Intermediated Care Work," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 35(5), pages 872-890, October.
    5. Omidi, Afshin & Dal Zotto, Cinzia & Gandini, Alessandro, 2023. "Labor process theory and critical HRM: A systematic review and agenda for future research," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 899-913.
    6. Marco Marrone & Paolo Borghi, 2023. "Ai margini del sindacato, il sindacato nei margini: democratizzazione, demercificazione e disinquinamento tra alleanze possibili e nuove pratiche," ECONOMIA E SOCIET? REGIONALE, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(3), pages 35-52.
    7. Ryan A Morgan & Ward van Zoonen & Claartje ter Hoeven, 2023. "Lost in the crowd? An investigation into where microwork is conducted and classifying worker types," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 29(3), pages 301-322, September.
    8. Lorenzo Cini & Vincenzo Maccarrone & Arianna Tassinari, 2022. "With or without U(nions)? Understanding the diversity of gig workers’ organizing practices in Italy and the UK," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(3), pages 341-362, September.
    9. Paula McDonald & Penny Williams & Robyn Mayes & Maria Khan, 2024. "Income generation on care work digital labour platforms," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 62(2), pages 358-380, June.
    10. repec:osf:socarx:jt4z7_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Herr, Benjamin & Schörpf, Philip & Flecker, Jörg, 2021. "Virtuelle Kommunikationsräume als Ausgangspunkt für Interessenartikulation in der Onlineplattformarbeit [Virtual communication rooms as a launching area for the articulation of interests in remote platform-work]," Industrielle Beziehungen. Zeitschrift für Arbeit, Organisation und Management, Verlag Barbara Budrich, vol. 28(2), pages 172-193.
    12. Bingqing Xia, 2022. "Labour agency in the future of work: Shenzhen’s maker community," The Economic and Labour Relations Review, , vol. 33(3), pages 484-501, September.
    13. Danijela Dolenec & Daniela Širinić & Ana Balković, 2022. "Resisting the Great Recession: Social movement unionism in Croatia and Serbia," European Journal of Industrial Relations, , vol. 28(1), pages 105-121, March.
    14. Gilles Paché, 2020. "Inside Delivery Platforms: The Covid-19 Pandemic And After," Post-Print hal-03041080, HAL.
    15. Constantine Manolchev & Richard Saundry & Duncan Lewis, 2021. "Breaking up the ‘precariat’: Personalisation, differentiation and deindividuation in precarious work groups," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(3), pages 828-851, August.
    16. Minaketan Behera & Sourav Nigam, 2025. "Automation, Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Labour Market in India: Challenges and Road Ahead," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 19(1), pages 159-167, April.
    17. S. Ramesh & C. Shobha, 2025. "Unequal gigs: developing a scale to measure socio-economic disparities among gig workers," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 52(3), pages 355-368, September.
    18. Alex J. Wood, 2021. "Algorithmic Management: Consequences for Work Organisation and Working Conditions," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2021-07, Joint Research Centre.
    19. Sabine Krueger & Christian Ebner & Daniela Rohrbach-Schmidt, 2024. "Gender Composition and the Symbolic Value of Occupations: New Evidence of a U-shaped Relationship between Gender and Occupational Prestige Based on German Microdata," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(1), pages 242-261, February.
    20. repec:osf:socarx:y943w_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Niki Panteli & Andriana Rapti & Dora Scholarios, 2020. "‘If He Just Knew Who We Were’: Microworkers’ Emerging Bonds of Attachment in a Fragmented Employment Relationship," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 34(3), pages 476-494, June.
    22. Stephany, Fabian, 2021. "When Does it Pay Off to Learn a New Skill? Revealing the Complementary Benefit of Cross-Skilling," SocArXiv sv9de, Center for Open Science.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:30:y:2024:i:4:p:487-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.