IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v7y1978i1p55-84.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Example of Evaluation Research as a Cottage Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Useem

    (Boston University)

  • Paul Dimaggio

    (Harvard University)

Abstract

Research resources are likely to be critical determinants of the technical quality of nongovernmental evaluation research, and quality in turn may affect the utility of the research. It is hypothesized that technical quality is a function of (1) the principal investigator's research background (prior research experience and formal training), (2) the study's financial resources, and (3) the study's institutional setting (the type of organization housing the study, the prior research experience of the housing organization, the profession of the investigator, and the ties between the organization housing the study and the organization that is the subject of the research). Further, it is hypothesized that technical quality has a significant bearing on the policy application of the completed research. These predictions are examined with data on eighty-six studies of museums and performing-arts attenders in the United States, acquired from the principal investigators and from study reports. Five of the research resource elements examined are found to have little impact on technical quality, but two have a major impact-the study's financial resources and the profession of the principal investigator. The research resource dimensions collectively explain 63% of the variance in study quality. Contrary to expectations, however, technical quality and utility are largely uncorrelated. The latter finding may be the result of the relative underdevelopment of applied research in the nonprofit private sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Useem & Paul Dimaggio, 1978. "An Example of Evaluation Research as a Cottage Industry," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 7(1), pages 55-84, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:7:y:1978:i:1:p:55-84
    DOI: 10.1177/004912417800700103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912417800700103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/004912417800700103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:7:y:1978:i:1:p:55-84. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.