IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v6y1977i1p45-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Notes On the Contamination Method

Author

Listed:
  • John Berman

    (University of Nebraska—Lincoln)

  • Harriet McCombs

    (University of Nebraska—Lincoln)

  • Robert Boruch

    (Northwestern University)

Abstract

The contamination method of obtaining confidential information was compared to more standard methods of interviewing, with the criterion being the degree to which the methods elicited candid responses. Two experiments were conducted in which college students were asked whether or not they had engaged in a variety of behaviors which were illegal, immoral, and/or embarrassing to admit. The results of both studies showed no differences between the interviewing methods in affirmation rates. A plausible explanation for the contamination method's failure to produce more candid responses than standard interviewing methods was provided in Study II, where it was found that the use of contamination method caused subjects to perceive the questions as significantly more sensitive. Implications and qualifications of these results were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • John Berman & Harriet McCombs & Robert Boruch, 1977. "Notes On the Contamination Method," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 6(1), pages 45-62, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:6:y:1977:i:1:p:45-62
    DOI: 10.1177/004912417700600102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912417700600102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/004912417700600102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:6:y:1977:i:1:p:45-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.