IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v55y2026i3p925-956.html

Tracking Ideological Changes in an Authoritarian State Using Retweeting Ties: The Case of Chinese Opinion Leaders

Author

Listed:
  • Yinxian Zhang

Abstract

While public opinion and ideology can impact political outcomes in an authoritarian state, measuring and tracking its ideological change remains a challenge. This is largely due to data constraints in nondemocratic contexts, such as limited data on political participation and the scarcity of panel opinion surveys, which are usually costly and tightly controlled by the state. This study proposes a method that relies solely on retweeting ties to produce ideological estimates and to track its changes over time, even in authoritarian settings. Taking Chinese online opinion leaders as an example, this study employs multiple correspondence analysis to estimate the ideological spectrum of these leaders. Results show that, over the past decade, these opinion leaders have gradually shifted toward the conservative/nationalist right with evidence of ideological polarization. The study validates the results against alternative ideological estimates, demonstrating the robustness of the retweet-based approach for tracking ideological changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yinxian Zhang, 2026. "Tracking Ideological Changes in an Authoritarian State Using Retweeting Ties: The Case of Chinese Opinion Leaders," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 55(3), pages 925-956, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:55:y:2026:i:3:p:925-956
    DOI: 10.1177/00491241251343580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00491241251343580
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00491241251343580?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:55:y:2026:i:3:p:925-956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.