IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v54y2025i3p933-983.html

Quantifying Narrative Similarity Across Languages

Author

Listed:
  • Hannah Waight
  • Solomon Messing
  • Anton Shirikov
  • Margaret E. Roberts
  • Jonathan Nagler
  • Jason Greenfield
  • Megan A. Brown
  • Kevin Aslett
  • Joshua A. Tucker

Abstract

How can one understand the spread of ideas across text data? This is a key measurement problem in sociological inquiry, from the study of how interest groups shape media discourse, to the spread of policy across institutions, to the diffusion of organizational structures and institution themselves. To study how ideas and narratives diffuse across text, we must first develop a method to identify whether texts share the same information and narratives, rather than the same broad themes or exact features. We propose a novel approach to measure this quantity of interest, which we call “narrative similarity,†by using large language models to distill texts to their core ideas and then compare the similarity of claims rather than of words, phrases, or sentences. The result is an estimand much closer to narrative similarity than what is possible with past relevant alternatives, including exact text reuse, which returns lexically similar documents; topic modeling, which returns topically similar documents; or an array of alternative approaches. We devise an approach to providing out-of-sample measures of performance (precision, recall, F1) and show that our approach outperforms relevant alternatives by a large margin. We apply our approach to an important case study: The spread of Russian claims about the development of a Ukrainian bioweapons program in U.S. mainstream and fringe news websites. While we focus on news in this application, our approach can be applied more broadly to the study of propaganda, misinformation, diffusion of policy and cultural objects, among other topics.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannah Waight & Solomon Messing & Anton Shirikov & Margaret E. Roberts & Jonathan Nagler & Jason Greenfield & Megan A. Brown & Kevin Aslett & Joshua A. Tucker, 2025. "Quantifying Narrative Similarity Across Languages," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 54(3), pages 933-983, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:54:y:2025:i:3:p:933-983
    DOI: 10.1177/00491241251340080
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00491241251340080
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00491241251340080?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gregory Eady & Tom Paskhalis & Jan Zilinsky & Richard Bonneau & Jonathan Nagler & Joshua A. Tucker, 2023. "Exposure to the Russian Internet Research Agency foreign influence campaign on Twitter in the 2016 US election and its relationship to attitudes and voting behavior," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Mozer, Reagan & Miratrix, Luke & Kaufman, Aaron Russell & Jason Anastasopoulos, L., 2020. "Matching with Text Data: An Experimental Evaluation of Methods for Matching Documents and of Measuring Match Quality," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(4), pages 445-468, October.
    3. Laurer, Moritz & van Atteveldt, Wouter & Casas, Andreu & Welbers, Kasper, 2024. "Less Annotating, More Classifying: Addressing the Data Scarcity Issue of Supervised Machine Learning with Deep Transfer Learning and BERT-NLI," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(1), pages 84-100, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sallin, Aurelién, 2021. "Estimating returns to special education: combining machine learning and text analysis to address confounding," Economics Working Paper Series 2109, University of St. Gallen, School of Economics and Political Science.
    2. Omri Feldman & Amar Venugopal & Jann Spiess & Amir Feder, 2026. "Causal Effect Estimation with Latent Textual Treatments," Papers 2602.15730, arXiv.org.
    3. repec:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:10:p:1198-1207 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sandrine Chausson & Marion Fourcade & David J. Harding & Björn Ross & Grégory Renard, 2026. "The Insight-Inference Loop: Efficient Text Classification via Natural Language Inference and Threshold-Tuning," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 55(2), pages 568-615, May.
    5. repec:osf:osfxxx:r3qng_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Benjamin Born & Nora Lamersdorf & Jana-Lynn Schuster & Sascha Steffen, 2025. "From Tweets to Transactions: High-Frequency Inflation Expectations, Consumption, and Stock Returns," CESifo Working Paper Series 12361, CESifo.
    7. Margaret E. Roberts & Brandon M. Stewart & Richard A. Nielsen, 2020. "Adjusting for Confounding with Text Matching," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 887-903, October.
    8. Yara Kyrychenko & Tymofii Brik & Sander Linden & Jon Roozenbeek, 2024. "Social identity correlates of social media engagement before and after the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Aur'elien Sallin, 2021. "Estimating returns to special education: combining machine learning and text analysis to address confounding," Papers 2110.08807, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2022.
    10. Marius Dragomir & José Rúas-Araújo & Minna Horowitz, 2024. "Beyond online disinformation: assessing national information resilience in four European countries," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    11. Yukthakiran Matla & Rohith Rao Yannamaneni & George Pappas, 2024. "Globalizing Food Items Based on Ingredient Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-22, August.
    12. Cova, Joshua & Schmitz, Luuk, 2024. "A primer for the use of classifier and generative large language models in social science research," OSF Preprints r3qng, Center for Open Science.
    13. Marcel Caesmann & Matteo Grigoletto & Lorenz Gschwent, 2024. "Censorship in democracy," ECON - Working Papers 446, Department of Economics - University of Zurich, revised Jun 2026.
    14. Roman Senninger & Jens Blom‐Hansen, 2021. "Meet the critics: Analyzing the EU Commission's Regulatory Scrutiny Board through quantitative text analysis," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(4), pages 1436-1453, October.
    15. Pablo Picazo-Sanchez, 2025. "Breaking the silence: the rise of hate speech in Spanish politics," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 1-26, August.
    16. Lindsey A. Gallo & Kendall V. Lynch & Rimmy E. Tomy, 2023. "Out of Site, Out of Mind? The Role of the Government‐Appointed Corporate Monitor," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 61(5), pages 1633-1698, December.
    17. Sandra Walzenbach & Thomas Hinz, 2025. "When Confirmation Bias Outweighs Expertise: A Factorial Survey On Credibility Judgments Of Polarizing Covid-19 News," EconStor Preprints 324165, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    18. Henrika Langen, 2022. "The Impact of the #MeToo Movement on Language at Court -- A text-based causal inference approach," Papers 2209.00409, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    19. repec:osf:socarx:aep9v_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Jiaming Zeng & Michael F. Gensheimer & Daniel L. Rubin & Susan Athey & Ross D. Shachter, 2022. "Uncovering interpretable potential confounders in electronic medical records," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    21. Hao Chen & Dylan S. Small, 2022. "New multivariate tests for assessing covariate balance in matched observational studies," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 78(1), pages 202-213, March.
    22. R. Michael Alvarez & Jacob Morrier, 2024. "Measuring the Quality of Answers in Political Q&As with Large Language Models," Papers 2404.08816, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2025.
    23. Adel Daoud & Richard Johansson & Connor T. Jerzak, 2025. "Detecting and Mitigating Treatment Leakage in Text-Based Causal Inference: Distillation and Sensitivity Analysis," Papers 2601.02400, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:54:y:2025:i:3:p:933-983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.