IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v54y2025i3p1197-1242.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Generative AI Meets Open-Ended Survey Responses: Research Participant Use of AI and Homogenization

Author

Listed:
  • Simone Zhang
  • Janet Xu
  • AJ Alvero

Abstract

The growing popularity of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools presents new challenges for data quality in online surveys and experiments. This study examines participants’ use of large language models to answer open-ended survey questions and describes empirical tendencies in human versus large language model (LLM)-generated text responses. In an original survey of research participants recruited from a popular online platform for sourcing social science research subjects, 34 percent reported using LLMs to help them answer open-ended survey questions. Simulations comparing human-written responses from three pre-ChatGPT studies with LLM-generated text reveal that LLM responses are more homogeneous and positive, particularly when they describe social groups in sensitive questions. These homogenization patterns may mask important underlying social variation in attitudes and beliefs among human subjects, raising concerns about data validity. Our findings shed light on the scope and potential consequences of participants’ LLM use in online research.

Suggested Citation

  • Simone Zhang & Janet Xu & AJ Alvero, 2025. "Generative AI Meets Open-Ended Survey Responses: Research Participant Use of AI and Homogenization," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 54(3), pages 1197-1242, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:54:y:2025:i:3:p:1197-1242
    DOI: 10.1177/00491241251327130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00491241251327130
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00491241251327130?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:54:y:2025:i:3:p:1197-1242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.