IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v50y2021i2p597-626.html

Negotiations in the Shadow of Outside Alternatives: An Estimation Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Marius Radean

Abstract

Many political and socioeconomic binary outcomes are the result of multiactor interaction: states joining a given international institution (e.g., military alliance, economic block) and not its rivals, people entering the workforce as an employee of a specific firm and not of its competitors, and so on. Yet most empirical studies analyze multilateral phenomena as the (joint) binary choice of either a single or, at most, two decision makers. This is due in part to a lack of empirical estimators that can efficiently deal with multiactor interaction. Analyzing multilateral processes as a set of either monadic or dyadic events, though, introduces bias and has important consequences for the estimates and ultimately the inferences that one would draw. In this article, I develop a new empirical estimator that is specifically designed to analyze multiparty interactions. Specifically, the model can accommodate the input of multiple actors into a unified, overarching decision-making process. Results from a Monte Carlo analysis and an application to real data on alliance formation demonstrate the superior performance of the new estimator relative to the standard approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius Radean, 2021. "Negotiations in the Shadow of Outside Alternatives: An Estimation Strategy," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 50(2), pages 597-626, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:50:y:2021:i:2:p:597-626
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124118789712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124118789712
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124118789712?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gordon, Sanford C. & Smith, Alastair, 2004. "Quantitative Leverage Through Qualitative Knowledge: Augmenting the Statistical Analysis of Complex Causes," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 233-255, July.
    2. Nieman, Mark David, 2015. "Statistical Analysis of Strategic Interaction with Unobserved Player Actions: Introducing a Strategic Probit with Partial Observability," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(3), pages 429-448, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gary Goertz & Tony Hak & Jan Dul, 2013. "Ceilings and Floors," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 42(1), pages 3-40, February.
    2. John Gerring & Lee Cojocaru, 2016. "Selecting Cases for Intensive Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(3), pages 392-423, August.
    3. Michael Gibilisco & Brenton Kenkel & Miguel R. Rueda, 2022. "Competition and Civilian Victimization," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 66(4-5), pages 809-835, May.
    4. Marra Giampiero & Radice Rosalba, 2017. "A joint regression modeling framework for analyzing bivariate binary data in R," Dependence Modeling, De Gruyter, vol. 5(1), pages 268-294, December.
    5. Macartan Humphreys, 2005. "Natural Resources, Conflict, and Conflict Resolution," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 49(4), pages 508-537, August.
    6. Carsten Q. Schneider & Ingo Rohlfing, 2016. "Case Studies Nested in Fuzzy-set QCA on Sufficiency," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(3), pages 526-568, August.
    7. O'Brien, Cheryl, 2015. "Transnational issue-specific expert networking: A pathway to local policy change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 285-291.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:50:y:2021:i:2:p:597-626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.